Op werkdagen voor 23:00 besteld, morgen in huis Gratis verzending vanaf €20
010-4731397
Balanced Ethics Review
Balanced Ethics Review
Simon N. Whitney Meer over Simon N. Whitney

Balanced Ethics Review

A Guide for Institutional Review Board Members

 Paperback Engels 2015 9783319207049
€ 20,19
In winkelwagen
Levertijd ongeveer 9 werkdagen
Gratis verzonden

Samenvatting

This manual will help Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) conduct ethics review that balances the major moral considerations in research with human subjects. Current challenges in the IRB environment are addressed with arguments and insights from dozens of scholars. Useful to the IRB member at any level of experience, Balanced Ethics Review provides the necessary tools needed to create a systemic blueprint for promoting the research and dissemination of scientists and scholars within the standard norms of regulation.

Specificaties

ISBN13:9783319207049
Taal:Engels
Bindwijze:paperback
Uitgever:Springer International Publishing
Hoofdrubriek:Geneeskunde, Mens en maatschappij

Lezersrecensies

Wees de eerste die een lezersrecensie schrijft!
Uw waardering
?
Klik om uw waardering te geven

Inhoudsopgave

<p>Table of Contents</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Title Page</p><p>Dedication</p><p>Preface</p><p>Acknowledgements</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Chapter 1. Introduction</p><p>1.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Overview</p><p>1.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Ethics and the IRB</p><p>1.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; IRB Process</p><p>1.4&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Evaluating Biomedical Research</p><p>1.5&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Consent in Biomedical Research </p><p>1.6&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Social Sciences</p><p>1.7&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Biomedical Research Topics</p><p>1.8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; FDA and OHRP</p><p>1.9&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Future</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Chapter 2. Ethics and the IRB</p><p>2.1 &nbsp;&nbsp; Your Influential Position</p><p>2.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Evidence</p><p>2.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Scandal</p><p>2.4&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Research Ethics</p><p>2.4.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Two Ethical Principles</p><p>2.4.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Two Ethical Goals</p><p>2.4.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Goals into Practice</p><p>2.4.4&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Today’s Loss of Balance</p><p>2.4.5&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; It’s Always about People</p><p>2.5&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Ethical Goals and Regulatory Means</p><p>2.5.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Principles of Regulation</p><p>2.5.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Organization and Legal Framework</p><p>2.6&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Your IRB Service</p><p>2.6.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Compensation</p><p>2.6.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Protection from Lawsuits</p><p>2.6.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Community Member</p><p>2.7&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Triumph of Ethics Review</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Chapter 3. IRB Process</p><p>3.1 &nbsp;&nbsp; Principles</p><p>3.1.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Respectfulness</p><p>3.1.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Transparency</p><p>3.1.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Efficiency</p><p>3.1.4&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Clarity</p><p>3.1.5&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Accountability</p><p>3.1.6&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Judiciousness</p><p>3.1.7&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Rationality</p><p>3.1.8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Restraint</p><p>3.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Curse of Power</p><p>3.2.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Scope of IR</p><p></p><p></p>B Authority<p></p><p>3.2.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Litigation Prevention</p><p>3.2.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Beyond the Regulations</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Chapter 4. Evaluating Biomedical Research</p><p>4.1 &nbsp;&nbsp; The Objective IRB</p><p>4.1.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Ramsey and the Scientist’s Bias</p><p>4.1.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Your Reasonable Understanding</p><p>4.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Literature Reviews</p><p>4.2.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Death at Johns Hopkins</p><p>4.2.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Reviews by Investigators</p><p>4.2.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Reviews by IRBs</p><p>4.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Ethics and Science</p><p>4.3.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Scientific Modifications</p><p>4.3.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Value of Research</p><p>4.3.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Risk</p><p>4.4&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Weighing Risks, Benefits, and Knowledge</p><p>4.4.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Why You Should Protect Subjects</p><p>4.4.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Why You Should Let Subjects Choose</p><p>4.4.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Conundrum</p><p>4.5&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Approval Based on Risk and Benefit</p><p>4.5.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Established Theories</p><p>4.5.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Rajczi and Meyer: Let the Subjects Decide&nbsp; </p><p>4.6&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Consent before Approval</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Chapter 5. Consent in Biomedical Research</p><p>5.1 &nbsp;&nbsp; Consent’s Goals</p><p>5.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Multisite Consent Forms</p><p>5.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Presenting Risk and Benefit</p><p>5.4&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Subject Understanding</p><p>5.4.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Less is More</p><p>5.4.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Ethical Considerations</p><p>5.5&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Supervising Consent Form Writing</p><p>5.5.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Helping the Investigator</p><p>5.5.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Readability</p><p>5.5.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Format</p><p>5.6&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Editing the Consent Form</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Chapter 6. The Social Sciences</p><p>6.1 &nbsp;&nbsp; The Value of Dissent</p><p>6.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Social Impact of R</p>esearch<p></p> <p></p>6.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Freedom of Speech<p></p><p>6.4&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Psychology</p><p>6.4.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Deception</p><p>6.4.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Threats to Self-Esteem</p><p>6.5&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Surveys and Interviews</p><p>6.5.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Risk and Benefit</p><p>6.5.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Modifications</p><p>6.6&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Field Research</p><p>6.6.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Risk</p><p>6.6.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Sociologists’ Dispute</p><p>6.7&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Racial Discrimination</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Chapter 7. Biomedical Research Topics</p><p>7.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Archival Research</p><p>7.1.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Cancer of the Vagina</p><p>7.1.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Regulatory Oversight</p><p>7.1.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Ethical Considerations</p><p>7.1.4&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Common Rule</p><p>7.1.5&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; HIPAA</p><p>7.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Learning Health Care System</p><p>7.2.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Integrating Research and Clinical Care</p><p>7.2.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Ethical Considerations</p><p>7.2.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Your IRB’s Role</p><p>7.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Randomized Controlled Trials</p><p>7.3.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Risks Inside and Outside of a Trial</p><p>7.3.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Nonphysical Risks</p><p>7.4&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Comparative Effectiveness Trials</p><p>7.4.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Identifying the Better Treatment</p><p>7.4.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Faden’s Bold Ethical Proposal</p><p>7.4.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Waiver of Consent in Special Circumstances</p><p>7.5&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Justice</p><p>7.5.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Unjust Burdens</p><p>7.5.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Governmental Pursuit of Justice</p><p>7.5.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Private Pursuit of Justice</p><p>7.6&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Vulnerable</p><p>7.6.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Regulatory Overprotection</p><p>7.6.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Fighting Health Disparities</p><p>7.7&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Paying Subjects</p><p>7.7.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Respecting Subject Choice</p><p>7.7.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Coercion</p><p>7.7.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>Setting<p></p> a Cap on Wages&nbsp; <p></p><p>7.8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Emergency Research</p><p>7.8.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Criteria for Approval&nbsp; </p><p>7.8.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Ethical Considerations</p><p>7.9&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Phase 1 Cancer Trials</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Chapter 8. FDA and OHRP</p><p>8.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Agencies under Pressure</p><p>8.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Your IRB and the Agencies</p><p>8.2.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Balancing Three Goals</p><p>8.2.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; When Regulations Trump Ethics</p><p>8.2.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Successful IRB</p><p>8.2.4&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Things Can Go Wrong</p><p>8.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Pushing Back against Federal Pressure</p><p>8.3.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Agency</p><p>8.3.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Funder</p><p>8.3.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Media</p><p>8.3.4&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Courts</p><p>8.4&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Risk and your IRB</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Chapter 9. The Future</p><p>9.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Evidence</p><p>9.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Reform</p><p>9.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Challenge</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>References</p><p>Index</p>

Aanbevolen live events

woensdag 30-09-2026

Jaarcongres Vrouwen met Impact

Seminar

Managementboek Top 100

Bekijk de volledige Managementboek Top 100
€ 20,19
Levertijd ongeveer 9 werkdagen
Gratis verzonden

Rubrieken

Uw cookie-instellingen
Deze website maakt gebruik van verschillende soorten cookies. Sommige cookies worden geplaatst door diensten van derden die op onze pagina's worden weergegeven. Om deze externe content te kunnen tonen is nodig dat u toestemming geeft voor het zetten van persoonlijke en marketingcookies. U kunt uw toestemming op elk moment wijzigen of intrekken. In onze cookieverklaring vindt u meer informatie.

    Personen

      Trefwoorden

        Balanced Ethics Review

        Recensiebeleid
        AI-book

        Wat is een AI-book?

        Een AI-book is niet een boek dat geschreven is door AI maar een boek dat verrijkt is met AI. Het maakt de inhoud van een boek interactief via WhatsApp, zodat je ermee kunt chatten. Zie het als een razend slimme assistent die het boek perfect begrijpt en er alles uit onthouden heeft. Jij kunt deze assistent alles vragen. Vraag bijvoorbeeld hoe je iets kunt toepassen op jouw persoonlijke situatie, om een korte samenvatting, of wat de belangrijkste inzichten zijn. AI-books zijn alleen te gebruiken via WhatsApp, je hoeft er geen aparte app voor te installeren.
        Meer informatie over AI-books

        ?

        Geef uw beoordeling

        Balanced Ethics Review

        Verwijder uw beoordeling